That’s all well and good, for way of explanation, but how do we fix it? Everything on screen appears slightly stretched horizontally. As you can see, what was a perfect circle at 4:3 is now a somewhat elongated ellipse when it’s stretched to fit this wider aspect ratio. In this case, the monitor stretches the image to fully fit the screen, ignoring the original aspect ratio. The third option, and what I expect you are experiencing, is to ignore the aspect ratio completely: The result is that the top and the bottom are lost since they don’t fit. In this case, the image is enlarged to fill the entire width of the screen while maintaining the original aspect ratio. Typically, the centered image has black bars on either side to take up the unused space.Īn alternative we almost never see is to crop:
#Optiquest monitor problems tv
You’ll see this all the time now when 4:3 standard definition TV shows are displayed on 16:9 HDTV screens. This is typically done by displaying the 4:3 image centered within the larger screen. The first choice is to maintain the aspect ratio of the original image:
#Optiquest monitor problems how to
Now, if you change nothing else and just plug in your new monitor, then the monitor needs to make a decision – how to display what is likely a 4:3 image in a 4.8:3 space. That means that’s it’s wider, in comparison, than your old monitor’s 4:3. That’s not a 4:3 ratio (it’s actually about 4.8:3, or more correctly 8:5). I looked up your new monitor, and it has a native resolution of 1680×1050 pixels. And I’m sure that they displayed just fine on your old CRT. If you look at screen resolutions, you’ll see something interesting measured in pixels, the old “standard” screen resolutions – 640×480, 800×600, 1024×768 – are all 4:3. Perhaps it’s 16:9, the new HD TV standard, but it could also be something else entirely. It’s likely that your old CRT has an aspect ratio of 4:3 … meaning that the width is 4/3 the height, or conversely, the height is 3/4 the width. This is a change we’re seeing in the world of television as well as screens change from standard to high definition. The difference that you’re seeing is that the “ aspect ratio” of your new monitor is likely different than it was on your old CRT. But exactly what choice depends on the capabilities of your monitor and your video card. The good news is that it is, likely, just that – a choice. In fact, if I so choose, I can make that problem happen on my computer monitors without much effort. Overall, this is a fair 1920x1200 display that will suffice for email and text editing, but is a total let-down if you're looking for quality, ergonomics or color accuracy.I’ve seen this computer monitor problem myself. Did anyone at Viewsonic try *using* this model before they shipped it out?Īs for the plastic stand, who cares, right? Well, it's so flimsy that when you bump your desk (e.g., by closing a drawer), the panel visibly wobbles back and forth for several seconds. The inner edges of the bezel are reflective, so you the borders of the display images are duplicated - get a thin bright moving ghost frame around the LCD. So if you need to reduce the luminance, you're going to lose a large chunk of the dynamic range and of the already-poor 6-bit color resolution. "Brightness" and "contrast" just play LUT tricks. This monitor doesn't have any backlight control. Conveniently for Viewsonic, most reviews you'll find on the net are with the original *VA panel. When I ordered this unit the specs on Viewsonic's site said 1:1000 178/178 now they're saying 1:800 160/160.
It also has a strong and angle-dependent pink cast in the midtones, and non-uniform backlighting. I have a Q241wb dated December 2007, and the panel is definitely TN, color inversion and all.
0 kommentar(er)
